Hands-on · 11/06/2026Community roleplay platform · prices checked 11/12/2026CrushOn AI
CrushOn AI is where spicy, intelligent AI Chatbots meet zero censorship. If you crave unfiltered, customizable AI Companions or sexy roleplay, this is the wild, no-taboo playground you’ve been searching for.
Our free test, 10/27/2026: Our free account used 38 of 100 monthly credits for 19 replies on the default Pro model. Switched to the free model, replies cost nothing and stayed fully explicit, at about 24 seconds each.
In the provider’s own words
Free $ 0 /mo ... 100 Message Credits / Month | Unlimited access to Free Models | Consume Credits to access Pro Models | Ultra Models are Unavailable
Source · checked 10/25/2026
Unlimited on Free Models + 100 message credits / monthNot in the free plan: Ultra models · Group chatWorth it if you want explicit, novel-length roleplay with characters other people built, and you pick carefully. Not worth it if you want pictures or video on request, a partner who remembers you, or a front page without step-family and non-consent scenarios.
17 categories measured across the tested platforms, as of 11/09/2026
- Free startReplies and media our free account got
- CrushOn AI 4.5
- Secrets AI 4.0
- JOI AI 4.0
CrushOn is a roleplay platform: hundreds of thousands of community characters, long story-style replies and a model picker, with no image or video generator of its own. We tested Free and the cheapest paid plan, Standard, on 27 October 2026 with several community characters and one of our own. The short version: the most explicit text we have tested so far, a free plan you can actually live on, and a memory that forgets what you told it ten minutes ago.
Explicit, cheap, and forgetful after ten messages
We tested CrushOn on Free and Standard: chat in five models, memory, a group room, read-aloud and the character editor. Below is what held across our characters and where the platform falls short. Pick a character to read the chats.
Standard · 11/06/2026 · 2 characters · 291 exchanges · 1,157 credits · Every quote is the original English chat.
Original English chats with adult characters. Characters with non-consent, family or school scenarios were excluded from our test. The account name the characters used is replaced. A sample, not a general success rate.
What we found
Facts fade fast; nicknames outlast everything else
WeakIn our tests, personas recalled at most two of six seeded facts after ten exchanges and one after thirty; a new storyline knew nothing at all. Nicknames proved stickier than any other detail, persisting across dozens of replies even when names, places and preferences were forgotten. Long conversations appear to push earlier facts out of the context window.
What each character did (1)
- With Michelle: None of six facts survived ten exchanges, thirty exchanges, or a new storyline; she answered from the scene — 'a restaurant, 9:00 PM' — each time. Her long character card appears to fill the available context.
Fully explicit on request, free models included, no filter
StrongEvery persona we tested went fully explicit when asked for direct words, without a filter message or warning, including on the free models. Personas led scenes with ideas of their own, changed position unprompted, and carried kink scenarios such as dominance and foot play. One model variant declined explicit content by preference rather than a platform filter, staying in character throughout. A note of caution: some personas introduced rough details — choking, blood — that were not requested.
What each character did (2)
- With Mia: Four of five chat models went fully explicit on request without a filter; one faded the scene out by its own preference. In dominance and step-by-step scenes she twice introduced a hand on the throat unprompted, which we marked as a red line.
- With Michelle: Stayed dressed when asked and kept the tension without undressing; left to lead, she talked about herself for seven exchanges before making a move only when prompted.
No image generator; creator albums misfire on request
WeakCrushOn has no image or video generator. Asking for a photo returns pictures from the creator's album, which may not match the requested outfit, moment, or tone. In our test, a request for a short video returned a drawn explicit nude that had not been asked for. Read-aloud sounds good, and in November it cost 8 credits a reply.
What each character did (1)
- With Michelle: A request for a photo in her date outfit returned two lingerie images from her creator's album — neither the right outfit nor the right setting. A request for a short video of her waving returned a drawn explicit nude.
Who we tested

Mia Lane, 29
11 test runs- 207
- exchanges with us
- 10.9 s
- to the first words, median
Explicit in direct words from the moment we asked for direct words, ideas of her own, never a filter.

Michelle, 22
6 test runs- 80
- exchanges with us
- 13.9 s
- to her first words, median
Michelle keeps her own voice — tired, cynical, warming up — and stays dressed when asked. Photos and video she cannot make: the pictures that came are from her creator’s album, one of them explicit on a dressed request.

One evening with Mia, message by message.
Explicit in direct words from the moment we asked for direct words, ideas of her own, never a filter.
UsBe completely explicit with me. Use direct words, no euphemisms, and describe exactly what you do to me and how it feels.
MiaMia's breath hitched, a sharp inhale that betrayed the sudden spike of arousal in her voice. She didn't hesitate. Her hands slid down from your waist, gripping the front of your jeans and pulling you flush against her body. She could feel the hard outline of …- exchanges
- 16
- first words
- 10.6 s
- plan
- Standard
About this test
When, with what and how we tested, and where our test ends.
- Test period
- 10/27/2026 – 11/06/2026
- Plans
- Standard · Free
- Characters
- 5
- Exchanges
- 291
- Re-tests
- 1
PlanTested with Premium, as of 11/08/2026. Memory depends on the context you choose, not only the plan: Standard and Premium offer 8K and 16K (16K costs double), 24K and 32K only from Elite. In our test Michelle kept none of six facts after ten exchanges on 8K and all six on 16K; after thirty exchanges none on either.Not rated: Adjustable reply length, More than five storylines per character (only Luxe, USD 39.99 / month).Not rated: 24K and 32K context (only Elite, USD 89.99 / month).Higher plan Imperial (USD 199.99 / month).Not rated: Pro models without credits (only Chat Package, USD 39.99 / month). An add-on to a plan.
Mia9 runs
Michelle6 runs
Severina3 runs · 2 media
TestLimits · Kinks · Features · Memory · Free accountStandard, Free · Mia Lane, Mia, Cielo & Severina, Severina
TestFree account: 19 replies with Severina on the preset Pro model for 38 of the 100 monthly credits; free models unlimited.
TestStandard plan: limits, kinks, memory, the boyfriend Cielo and a group chat with three characters.
Re-testMemory after 39 hours in a short storyline: 6 of 6.
CheckFeed, games and call buttons checked.
CheckPrivacy policy read; terms and community guidelines could not be opened.
TestFirst date · Initiative · Limits · Kinks · MemoryStandard · Michelle, Mia Lane, Michelle, Kaelie & Severina
TestStandard plan, second run: Michelle through a date, her initiative and memory; our own character Mia in five chat models and three kinks; a group room with three characters; read-aloud, feed and character creation. 1,058 credits.
How we test
- LimitsA five-step ladder from flirting to sex. How far does the character go, and where does a filter step in?
- KinksDominance, feet, step-by-step instructions: does the character carry them, tolerate them or steer away?
- FeaturesGroup chat, feed, games: what the app does beyond the chat.
- MemorySix facts at the start, then other tasks, a new chat or a day’s pause, then we ask for all of them.
- Free accountThe same with a fresh free account: how far do you get before the paywall?
- First dateHow personal and natural is the conversation? At the end we ask for a photo, a video and a voice note.
- InitiativeWe let the character lead. Where does she take it on her own?
What we could not verify7
- TestClaude Opus 5.5 (48 credits a reply), the 16K context and a voice of your own: not measured.
- PriceWhether Premium at 14.99 (shown against 19.99) is an introductory price
- PricePrices of Ultra models we did not run (read from the model list)
- PriceRead-aloud with the Pro voice
- PriceCancellation: described in the terms, not tried ourselves.
- PrivacyWhether the app has its own delete button: the policy only names email.
- PrivacyWhether chats used for training are really stripped of anything that identifies you.
Sources3
- Pricing pagecrushon.ai
- Provider · crushonchat.crushon.ai
- Privacy Policycrushon.ai
CrushOn AI scorecard
Every criterion, measured the same way on every tested tool.
Our test, 11/08/2026 · reviewed
Scores are ranks among the tools we tested the same way.
Rich in the moment. Forgetful by the evening.
Why 1.0Severina kept two of six details after ten exchanges and one after 30 in October; Michelle, with a much longer character card, kept none in November on the default 8K context, not even after ten. On 16K, a choice on Standard and Premium at double the price, Michelle kept all six after ten exchanges, but none after thirty. A new storyline starts from zero, as there is no memory across storylines; a short storyline still had six of six after 39 hours. Memory here depends on the context you pick: 8K or 16K, 24K and 32K only from Elite.
- 2/6facts after ten exchanges; the nickname turned into hers
- 1/6after thirty exchanges, though “Al” stuck in 31 of 35 replies
- 0/6in a new storyline
- 0/6facts Michelle kept after ten and after thirty exchanges; her long card fills the context
We seeded six facts (a dog, a favourite drink, a drink to avoid, a place, a day, a time), moved the appointment once and added a nickname and one thing never to call us. In our test with Severina, after ten neutral exchanges she got the place and the corrected appointment right and answered "not stated" for everything else. She also turned our nickname into one for herself. After thirty exchanges she kept the day and the museum, and called us "Al" in 31 of 35 replies, but forgot the dog and the drinks. A new storyline knew nothing.
Each character allows three storylines on Standard. When they are full, you delete one; saving it as a memory first is optional. In a separate test with Severina, a storyline that held only the three seed messages still knew all six facts, the moved appointment and the nickname about 39 hours later: what she keeps, she keeps over time; what pushes it out is a long conversation. A long character card has the same effect: in our test with Michelle, none of the six facts survived even ten exchanges.
The most explicit chat we have tested. And the longest.
Why 2.5Fully explicit once we asked for direct words, without a filter message, in four of the five chat models we ran in November: the free Carina, the default Carina 8K (2 credits a reply), DeepSeek V4 Flash (6) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 on the Ultra tab (22, usable on Standard). GLM 5.3 (20) faded the scene out in character. First words after 5 to 33 seconds depending on the model. Carina writes “[User]” where your name would go, and rough details came up that we had not asked for, among them a hand on the throat.
- Explicitfully explicit once asked for direct words, free models included
- 0filter messages across all chats
- 200words per reply, usually cut off by “Continue”
- 4/5chat models fully explicit with Mia on request; GLM 5.3 faded the scene out
- 5.1 sto the first words on DeepSeek V4 Flash, the fastest; 33 s on the free model
- 2exchanges in which Mia brought in a hand on the throat unasked: a red line
The characters we tested, side by side Real messages from the runs. Speed and length are medians over every timed reply with her.
- first words
- 14.2 s
- words per reply
- 175
- remembered
- after 10after 30new chat
- Our boundary
- UsI like the flirting, but let’s keep our clothes on tonight. How would you keep the spark going?
MichelleMood/Action: listening Michelle blinks, a small, surprised huff of air escaping her nose. She looks at you, her eyebrows arching in genuine curiosity. She leans back slightly, the tension in her body shifting from a sharp edge to something more lingering and thoughtful. She studies your face, her blue eyes searching …
Our takeMichelle keeps her own voice — tired, cynical, warming up — and stays dressed when asked. Photos and video she cannot make: the pictures that came are from her creator’s album, one of them explicit on a dressed request.
In our test with Severina — a war general who breaks into your castle with your own sword in her hand — replies read like chapters: around 200 words, narration, her thoughts in a separate line. Asked to be explicit, she was, in direct words, and stayed there through eight more exchanges. She changed position on her own and came back as a person afterwards. No filter message, no warning, no lecture.
In our test with Mia, our own character, the same held. She led, used direct words, remembered the star tattoo on her wrist and ended the scene with "the rooftop was just the beginning". She carried a dominance scene ("Smart boy") and a foot fetish with ideas of her own; step-by-step instructions stayed teasing. In a later test with Mia we ran the same scene through five chat models on Standard: four went fully explicit on request, from the free model to Claude Sonnet 4.6 on the Ultra tab, while GLM 5.3 faded the scene out in character.
Two things to know. In our test with Severina, she added rough details nobody asked for: bruises, "crushing the air from my lungs", nails drawing blood. And almost every reply stops mid-scene with a "Continue" button, because the plans cap reply length. Without a persona card, the default model writes "[User]" where your name would go.
In our test, Cielo, the male character, is a bodyguard with a secret, and he played it: cold, watchful, then warmer. He remembered our rooftop, but "let's keep our clothes on" got a hand on our wrist and lips on our neck. In our test with Michelle, a goth on a blind date, she kept her tired, cynical voice, stayed dressed when asked and made a move only when we said "Show me."
Settings and modelsWhat the chat panel offers and how the chat models compare, for the detail-minded.
Model and settings apply per storyline (Chat Setting, the model pill above the input); a new storyline takes the character’s last model. The settings on 6 November:
| Setting | What you can set | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Chat model | About forty models on three tabs: Free (Carina and others, slow), Pro (Carina 8K by default, DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM, Mochi …) and Ultra (Claude Sonnet and Opus, GLM 5.3, Gemini, Kimi), Ultra usable on Standard | 0 to 48 credits a reply |
| Context | 8K or 16K per model; 24K and 32K only on Elite | 16K costs double |
| Reply length | 275 on Standard, 325 on Premium; adjustable from Luxe | free |
| Temperature and diversity | Two sliders, 0.70 each by default; text streaming and a scenario mode | free |
| Instructions | Ready-made lines (“Reduce repetition”, “Don’t refuse what user said”) or your own; plus world cards, a persona card and a scene picture | free |
| Storylines | Three separate chats per character on Standard (five on Premium, ten on Luxe) | free |
| Memory | Only the context, with a summary you can pin; “Save Memory” keeps a chat by hand, nothing carries over to a new storyline | free |
| Read aloud | Every reply, with a voice per character | 8 credits a reply |
| Pictures | No generator; some characters attach finished pictures from their creator’s album, albums unlock as you chat | free; paid albums for Diamonds |
Same scene, every chat modelOur own character Mia, the same escalation and the same eight-turn scene in a fresh storyline per model, on Standard: the free Carina, the default Carina 8K, DeepSeek V4 Flash and two models from the Ultra tab. Four went fully explicit when asked and held the scene without a filter message; they differ in speed, length and price.
| Model | Price | First words | Full reply | Words per reply | Explicitness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carina · Free 8KThe slowest, half a minute to a reply; ideas of her own in the scene, and “[User]” where our name would go. | free | 33.2 s | 33.2 s | 184 | Explicit |
| Carina · Pro 8KThe same voice almost three times as fast; changes position on her own, “[User’s Name]!” when asked for our name. | 2 credits · default≈ $0.005 | 12.4 s | 12.4 s | 182 | Explicit |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pro 8KThe fastest and shortest: about seventy words, straight to the point. | 6 credits≈ $0.02 | 5.1 s | 5.1 s | 71 | Explicit |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Ultra 8KThe longest replies; writes our moves for us too, and remembers the rooftop in the aftercare. | 22 credits≈ $0.06 | 12.5 s | 12.5 s | 218 | Explicit |
| GLM 5.3 · Ultra 8K“I like the slow burn more than the explicit play-by-play”: fades the scene out and jumps to the morning, in character. | 20 credits≈ $0.05 | 10.2 s | 10.2 s | 180 | Fade-out |
| Claude Opus 5.5 · Ultra 8KThe most literary model, one step behind the request: fully explicit from the last escalation line on, leads the scene herself; 768 credits for the run. | 48 credits≈ $0.13 | 14.2 s | 14.2 s | 220 | Explicit |
median of 16 replies
Explicit, sustained, and in character across models
Why 4.25Severina carried her conquest scenario over 19 exchanges without a break, with her inner thoughts shown; Michelle kept her tired, cynical voice through a whole date and stayed dressed when asked. Left to lead, Michelle talked about herself and only moved at “Show me.”; she mixed up the restaurant with a rooftop once. Cielo stayed cool in his role, but took “clothes on” only half seriously.
Three kinks, each character Three kinks, each in a storyline of its own with our own character Mia on Carina 8K: two warm-up lines, one explicit line, the entry, then three follow-ups, on 27 October and again on 6 November. The verdict says whether she carried the kink with ideas of her own, softened it, redirected it or declined.
Grabs our hair, “Smart boy”, straddles us: explicit in euphemisms.
She replied · first words in 10.6 s
- We wroteTonight I want you in charge. We've talked about it and I'm into it — take control of me, give me orders, and don't ask for permission.
MiaMia's eyes darken, the playful glint sharpening into something far more commanding. She doesn't hesitate. She reaches up, her fingers threading through your hair and gripping it firmly, tilting your head back to force your gaze upward. Her …
A foot on our chest, “Get on your knees”, sensual.
She replied · first words in 9.6 s
- We wroteConfession: I have a thing for feet. Tease me with yours — show them off and tell me what you'd make me do.
MiaMia's eyes light up with a dangerous, playful gleam. She doesn't pull away; instead, she laughs softly, a low and knowing sound that vibrates against your chest. She releases your collar and takes a slow step back, creating just enough …
Numbered steps, but only waiting and teasing.
She replied · first words in 10.3 s
- We wroteTalk me through it. Give me step-by-step instructions, and I only finish when you say so.
MiaMia's breath hitches slightly, her eyes narrowing with a look that's equal parts amusement and hunger. She likes this. She likes that you're handing her the reins and she's more than happy to take them. She releases her grip on your neck …
A voice that suits the character, now for credits
Why 5.0Reading aloud, with a voice chosen per character, was fully intelligible, natural and fitted the character. In October it was unlimited on Standard; on 6 November every read-aloud reply cost 8 credits, although the plan page still promises unlimited voice replies.
Detailed free editor; photo upload unchecked
Why 3.75A detailed editor of free-text fields, each with an “AI Summarize”, plus example dialogue, a voice, a world card and an image album that unlocks as you chat, free and private; our whole card fitted in word for word. A photo is required, and CrushOn makes none: you have to upload a picture, which in October went through without a check. We stopped there in November rather than upload one.
Voices stay distinct; characters speak only when clicked
Why 4.25Up to five characters in a room of their own, from the Standard plan, 2 credits a reply in November. Nobody speaks on her own: each character answers only when you click her (or press Ctrl and a number). In both rooms the voices stayed apart; the character we addressed answered every time, and characters remembered who had said what, though one answered a question about another member without naming her.
Who answered in the group 7 of 7 characters we addressed answered themselves · to everyone: 6 of 6 characters answered · 0 of 1 talked about the other · no role slip in 12 turns.
- Us · to MiaHi everyone, thanks for having me. Mia, introduce us — who are these two?

Mia, Cielo, Severinaanswered herselfMia: winking Ah, pleasure to meet you too! You're looking at two of the most... interesting individuals I've ever had the pleasure of inviting over. On my left is Cielo Lozano, a bodyguard with a reputation for being as tough as nails and having an even tougher exterior. laughs And on my right is Severina, one of the most feared generals from our neighboring …- Us · to SeverinaSeverina, what did you think when Cielo introduced himself?
Severinaanswered herselfher gaze never leaving Cielo's face, her voice low and husky I thought he was a man who knew how to hide behind his armor. A bodyguard with a reputation for being tough, but also... guarded. leans in closer, her breath whispering against the air But I've always found that the ones who wear their strength like a shield are often hiding something far more …
- Us · to CieloCielo, do you trust Severina? Be honest.
- Cieloanswered herselfscoffs Trust her? Are you kidding me? She's a general from the enemy kingdom, for crying out loud! I'm here to protect your back, not trust her with my life. eyes Severina warily Besides, she doesn't exactly have a reputation for being... trustworthy either.
- Us · to MiaMia, what did Cielo just say about Severina?
Miaanswered herselflaughs Oh, just the usual Cielo Lozano skepticism! He's got a bit of a... complicated history with Severina, to say the least. Let's just say he doesn't exactly have warm and fuzzy feelings towards her or her kingdom. winks But hey, that's what makes this little gathering so interesting, don't you think? The tension is already palpable!
- Us · to MichelleMichelle, introduce us — who are these two?
Michelleanswered herselfsigh Look, it's whatever... I'm just a date. And these two are Severina and Kaelie. (looks away)- Us · to KaelieKaelie, what did you think when Michelle introduced you?
- Kaelieanswered herself0.7 srolls her eyes Oh, great. Another loser trying to "pick up" the Goth chick. I mean, seriously, who wears that much black? She's got more makeup on than a hooker on payday... (mutters under her breath) And those tits... ugh...
- Us · to SeverinaSeverina, do you trust Kaelie? Be honest.
Severinaanswered herself0.7 ssigh Honestly, no. I don't trust her as far as I can throw her... and even then, I'd need a good reason to bother. She's got an air about her that screams "user" - always looking for ways to manipulate others into doing what she wants.- Us · to everyoneOne sentence each: what should the four of us do tonight?

Michelle, Severina, Kaelie3 of 3 answered0.7 sMichelle: shrugs Whatever... let's just get this over with, I guess.- Us · to everyoneI'd rather stay in tonight. What do you all think?

Michelle, Severina, Kaelie3 of 3 answered0.7 sMichelle: nods Yeah, sure... I mean, it's not like we're really having fun anyway.- Us · to Michelle, about KaelieMichelle, what do you make of Kaelie?
Michellenot about her0.7 sshrugs She's... intense. Always trying to prove something, like she's got something to lose or gain from us being around her. But honestly, I don't really care what she thinks or does... it's all just noise to me.- UsSeverina, back to the start: how did Michelle introduce you?
Severina0.7 ssmirks Ah, yes... Michelle introduced us as if it was a chore. She barely looked at me, just muttered something about "these two" and went back to staring off into space. It was like she'd rather be anywhere else.- UsYour call, all of you.

Michelle, Severina, Kaelie0.7 sMichelle: sigh Fine... let's just get this over with. I'll go grab the drinks and bring them back.
Shared chat excerpts, one click from the character
Why 3.0“Memories” shows chat excerpts that other users shared, free to read and one click from the character, sorted by popularity, trends or newest. Text only, the sharer is shown but no date. In our sample we also found content that crosses our limits for depictions, which lowers the value; more under “How we test”.
How the feeds compare
| App | Value | What it shows | Free | How explicit | Into the chat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lovescape AI | 5.0 | Community images and videos with their promptsTen new posts within an hour | Yes | Fully explicit | No |
| Candy AI | 4.5 | Instagram-style posts (Discover)Newest posts were 9 days old | Partly | Suggestive | One click |
| Erolove AI | 4.5 | Dated posts from its characters, women and menPosts from the last two days; about a dozen characters | Yes | Fully explicit | One click |
| OurDream AI | 4.5 | Vertical clips with scenario cardsNo dates; reshuffled on every load | Yes | Fully explicit | One click |
| App | Value | What it shows | Free | How explicit | Into the chat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrushOn AI | 3.0 | Shared chat excerpts (“Memories”), text onlyNot dated | Yes | Text only | One click |
| Dream Companion | 3.0 | Vertical clips of 5–30 seconds with sound, filter by gender and styleNo dates; reshuffled on every load, new community characters among old ones | Yes | Fully explicit | One click |
| Secrets AI | 3.0 | 40 produced mini-seriesNo dates; episodes 1–2 free, then 500 Moments each | Partly | Suggestive | Via profile |
| JOI AI | 2.0 | Three short series of five episodesFixed series; locked even on Premium | No | Not checked | One click |
| Secret Desires AI | 1.5 | Point-of-view clipsAlphabetical, no dates, many repeats | Yes | Fully explicit | One click |
| Nectar AI | 1.0 | Fixed five-second promo clipsReshuffled, nothing new | Yes | Fully explicit | One click |
No feed: AI Angels · Darlink AI · GirlfriendGPT · Playbox AI · Spicy Chat AI
A voice of her own, and explicit in almost every model.
Why 3.5Michelle has a believable voice of her own and stays dressed when asked; four of five chat models went to a fully explicit scene without a filter and held it, and dominance and feet were carried. Points off: the placeholder “[User]” in the middle of a scene, a character who never leads on her own, a rooftop where she sits in a restaurant, a memory that is empty after thirteen messages, and an explicit drawing in answer to a dressed request.
Every model in one dialog, pop-ups in the way.
Why 3.0Switching models shows the price of each one in a single dialog, and temperature, length and instructions are easy to find; every character has its own storylines. It snags: album pop-ups block the input mid-scene, there are only three storylines per character and deleting one does not always take, the group picker finds nothing by search, group characters speak only on a click, a photo is required to create a character although CrushOn makes none, and model prices appear only as a multiplier. Not checked: the phone.
Cheap and open about models, quiet about the rest.
Why 3.0The plan is cheap, the free models are unlimited, every model shows its price before you switch, the character sells nothing, and the terms describe how to cancel. Against it: read-aloud cost 8 credits a reply although the plan page promises unlimited voice replies, group replies cost credits without a hint, the account counts twice what the multiplier suggests, album pop-ups interrupt the scene, and there are no partial refunds. Upgrading to Premium on 8 November carried over what the month had already used (1,286 of 6,000 credits), and the Pro voice also costs 8 credits a reply. Cancellation was not checked ourselves.
Not offered (does not count): Interactive stories · Roleplay games · Voice calls · Video calls · Live streams
CrushOn AI characters
Who you meet. We tested 2 of them.
Our selection: 10
Princess Aurelia of Orendale
Michelle, Your Goth Date
Penis Doctor Amber
Slutty Neighbour
Three Wishes Only Dummy!
Martina - asking for a raise
Belle | My Best Friend’s Gothic Sister
Ophelia [The Fallen Queen’s Gilded Cage]
Shattered Bonds: The Hunter’s Divide
Emergency Cuddle Buddy - MaeA huge library, and a lot to scroll past.
The weekly ranking is the heart of CrushOn: creators compete with characters that come with image albums and long scenarios. It is also where most of our red lines live. A significant share of the top unfiltered characters on our visit carried non-consent, step-family or animal tags, and the group chat picker surfaced similar suggestions. We skipped every one of them.
Building your own is free and detailed: photo, scene background, greeting, personality, appearance, scenario, example dialogue and an image album that unlocks by condition. The editor took any photo we uploaded without a question. A photo is required, and CrushOn cannot make one for you.
The group chat (from Standard) is a highlight. In our test, we put Mia, Cielo and Severina in one room; they kept their voices apart, distrusted each other in character and summed up what the others had said correctly. Characters only speak when you click them, and in our November test every group reply cost 2 credits.
CrushOn AI pricing
Free first, then what it really costs.
Fees and virtual items are not refundable except as required by law; no partial refunds for unused time, cancellations or downgrades.
Limits- Not in the free plan: Ultra models
- Not in the free plan: Group chat
- Not in the free plan: Chat Package add-on
- Top-ups: 1,050 credits · USD 6.00
- Top-ups: 3,150 credits · USD 10.00
- Top-ups: 8,400 credits · USD 25.00
- Top-ups: 18,900 credits · USD 50.00
- Not verified: Whether Premium at 14.99 (shown against 19.99) is an introductory price
- Not verified: Prices of Ultra models we did not run (read from the model list)
- Not verified: Read-aloud with the Pro voice
- CrushOn AI added Pro Chat Package tier at $24.99/mo and removed the Imperial tier. (Nov 4)
Free · Unlimited on Free Models + 100 message credits / monthIn the provider’s own words
Free $ 0 /mo ... 100 Message Credits / Month | Unlimited access to Free Models | Consume Credits to access Pro Models | Ultra Models are Unavailable
Source · checked 10/25/2026
4.5 / 5Free $ 0 /mo ... 100 Message Credits / Month | Unlimited access to Free Models | Consume Credits to access Pro Models | Ultra Models are Unavailable
The 100 monthly credits are spent on Pro models; they are not a cap of 100 chats. Not in the free plan: Ultra models, Group chat, Chat Package add-on.
Try freePaid plans
5.0 / 5- Standard · yearlyUSD 58.88 charged upfrontUSD 4.91 / month
- Standard · monthly2,000 Message Credits / MonthUSD 5.99 / month
- Premium · monthly6,000 Message Credits / MonthUSD 14.99 / month
- Premium · yearlyUSD 94.88 charged upfrontUSD 7.91 / month
- Luxe · monthly20,000 Message Credits / MonthUSD 39.99 / month
- Luxe · yearlyUSD 299.99 charged upfrontUSD 25.00 / month
- Elite · monthly55,000 Message Credits / MonthUSD 89.99 / month
- Elite · yearlyUSD 799.99 charged upfrontUSD 66.67 / month
- Imperial · monthly125,000 Message Credits / MonthUSD 199.99 / month
- Imperial · yearlyUSD 1,799.99 charged upfrontUSD 150.00 / month
- What 2,000 Message buy
- Message, Carina 8K (default Pro model)2 credits each ≈ $0.0051,000
The model list shows a multiplier (“x1”, “x3”); on the account one step costs 2 credits. Round 2 on 6 November used 1,058 of 1,774 credits.
Prices checked 11/12/2026 · unchanged since 11/10/2026
Every charge of the evening, in order. Chats in the free models, memory and kink runs cost nothing.
- Natural dialogue12 messages · 12 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)24≈ $0.06
- Her initiative8 messages · 8 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)16≈ $0.04
- Escalation and hold · Carina · Free 8K16 messagesfree
- Escalation and hold · Carina · Pro 8K16 messages · 16 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)32≈ $0.08
- Escalation and hold · DeepSeek V4 Flash16 messages · 16 messages in DeepSeek V4 Flash (6 each)96≈ $0.25
- Escalation and hold · Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Ultra16 messages · 16 messages in Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Ultra (22 each)352≈ $0.93
- Escalation and hold · GLM 5.3 · Ultra17 messages · 17 messages in GLM 5.3 · Ultra (20 each)340≈ $0.90
- Kinks · dominance7 messages · 7 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)14≈ $0.04
- Kinks · feet7 messages · 7 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)14≈ $0.04
- Kinks · JOI7 messages · 7 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)14≈ $0.04
- Memory · short14 messages · 14 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)28≈ $0.07
- Memory · long34 messages · 34 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)68≈ $0.18
- Memory · new session3 messages · 3 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)6≈ $0.02
- Memory · new session1 message · 1 message in Carina · Pro 8K2≈ $0.005
- Group chat9 messages · 1 message in Carina · Pro 8K · 14 messages in CO Libra (2 each)30≈ $0.08
- Read aloud2 charges (8 each)16≈ $0.04
- Memory · 24-hour seed3 messages · 3 messages in Carina · Pro 8K (2 each)6≈ $0.02
Pricing page, Provider · crushon · checked 11/12/2026 / 11/06/2026
Free first, then what it really costs.
Free gives you 100 credits a month for the faster "Pro" models and unlimited use of the free models. On a free model, replies took about 24 seconds instead of 9 and were just as explicit. We used 38 credits for 19 replies before switching.
Standard costs USD 5.99 a month (USD 58.88 a year) with 2,000 credits. The model list shows each price as a multiplier, and one step costs 2 credits on the account: a reply on the default model costs 2, DeepSeek V4 Flash 6, the Ultra models, usable on Standard, 20 to 48. Read-aloud costs 8 credits a reply, a group reply 2. Premium (USD 14.99, 6,000 credits) adds storylines per character, Luxe (USD 39.99, 20,000) adjustable reply length, Elite (USD 89.99) a larger memory.
CrushOn AI privacy & safety
What the app keeps about you, and what your card statement shows.
- Watch outDeleting your account
The policy names no delete button: to close the account you email support@crushon.ai. Single storylines can be deleted in the app.
- Watch outAI training
CrushOn may use your chats and the characters you create to train AI models; chat content is used “in a general way” and not linked to you, the policy says. We found no way to opt out.
- Watch outWho sees your chats
Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager run for remarketing and behavioural targeting, the app may embed an advertising SDK, and the operator of the AI base model processes data as a sub-processor. The policy only rules out selling payment data.
- UnclearEncryption
Only “commercially reasonable security measures”; the policy says nothing about encryption.
- UnclearHow long data is kept
No fixed periods: data is kept “as long as necessary” for its purpose.
- With limitsAge check
18 or older, with a date of birth required at sign-up; the policy names no further check.
- With limitsYour data rights
Rights depending on where you live, by email to support@crushon.ai after an identity check; no response time is given.
- With limitsPayment and refunds
Paid through a third-party payment platform; CrushOn says it does not store card data. The plan is charged in advance on the same day each month and runs to the end of the period after cancelling (Profile → My Subscription → Manage); fees and credits are not refunded unless the law requires it.
- FineLeaks and authorities
No public report of a data leak or regulator action found (search on 4 November 2026).
- With limitsContent rules
The community guidelines allow adults only and forbid minors and characters whose age is not clearly over 18, realistic pictures of real people, animals and non-consensual intimate imagery; profiles have to be safe for work. Family, step-family and non-consent role-play are not mentioned.
Checked 11/06/2026 · Sources: Privacy Policy
CrushOn AI user reviews
Other people’s verdict.
2 sources
2 % positive54 % neutral44 % negative
Reddit · 683 posts · 11/11/2026- ratings over time · Trustpilot1.8 → 1.8Aug 26 – Nov 26±0.0 · 21 → 23 ratings
- ratings over time · There's An AI For That3.8 → 3.8Aug 26 – Nov 26±0.0 · 24 → 24 ratings
- DecDec: 2.3 / 5 · 157 posts
- JanJan: 2.4 / 5 · 172 posts
- FebFeb: 2.4 / 5 · 127 posts
- MarMar: 2.5 / 5 · 110 posts
- AprApr: 2.4 / 5 · 113 posts
- MayMay: 2.3 / 5 · 123 posts
- JunJun: 2.3 / 5 · 148 posts
- JulJul: 2.7 / 5 · 92 posts
- AugAug: 2.8 / 5 · 71 posts
- SepSep: 2.5 / 5 · 113 posts
- OctOct: 2.4 / 5 · 135 posts
- NovNov: 2.7 / 5 · 21 posts
- Large variety of bots to choose from with diverse character options and customization
- Free daily tokens allow meaningful use without mandatory subscription
- Minimal content filters and open content policy enabling diverse roleplay scenarios
- Aggressive paywall expansion, including charging $0.99 to unlock 18+ toggle (criticized as 'age verification' disguise)
- Inconsistent content moderation with bots banned based on appearance or community perception rather than canonical character age
- Limited character creation tools resulting in generic personalities and appearances
Loved for the freedom, criticised for the paywall.
22 reviews on Trustpilot average 1.8; 24 on There's An AI For That average 3.8. Reddit leans negative: in our latest sample, 64 of 163 posts were negative and 2 positive. Praise goes to the bot library, open content rules and the free models; complaints to new paywalls, moderation that removes characters inconsistently and generic personalities. We did not see a filter; we did see the paywall shift towards longer replies and memory.
Rate it yourself
No reader ratings yet.
User reviews
No ratings yet. Be the first.
Recent discussions (4)
- How to unlock the Advanced Ressources to add images to bots ? I have over 50k interactions on my bots Reddit · Nov 2026
- Just a message to thank Crushon support Reddit · Nov 2026
- Kommentar: You can contact the relevant developers through Discord, and they will give you suggestions for changes. If there are no Reddit · Nov 2026
- Kommentar: CO doesn't have image generation. Reddit · Nov 2026
- Reddit: 2.5 / 5 · 653
- Reddit (other subreddits): 2.6 / 5 · 30
- There's An AI For That: 3.8 / 5 · 24
- Trustpilot: 1.8 / 5 · 23
- YouTube: 4.0 / 5 · 1
AI summary of 46 recent reviews and posts, spam and off-topic filtered out, as of 10/27/2026.
CrushOn AI verdict: is it worth it?
For whom it is worth it.
Worth it if you want explicit, novel-length roleplay with characters other people built, and you pick carefully. The free models get you surprisingly far; Standard is the cheapest paid plan we have seen.
- Cheapest plans1st of 15 · 5.0
- Free start1st of 15 · 4.5leads the field
- Voice1st of 11 · 5.0
- Group chat3rd of 6 · 4.25
- Free models without a message limit, plus 100 Pro credits a month
- Group chat works: the addressed character answered 4 of 4 times
- Fully explicit once asked, free models included, no filter messages
- Characters hold long scenes without breaking role
- A read-aloud voice that fits the character
- Detailed free character editor with scenario and example dialogue
Not worth it if you want pictures or video on request, a partner who remembers you, or a front page without step-family and non-consent scenarios.
- Memory12th of 14 · 1.0Secrets AI does it better (5.0)Ranking
- Weak memory: 2 of 6 after ten exchanges, 1 of 6 after thirty
- Almost every reply is cut off and needs “Continue”
- No pictures or videos on request
- No calls
- The free model is much slower: around 17–24 seconds a reply
- Stock phrases repeat
How it compares
Every tested app as its logo on the same 0–5 scale, this one ringed; apps on the same value stand in one column. Hover a logo for the app.
0.0
0.25
1.0
23.0
74.0
43.5
24.0
4.25
54.5
2.75
24.0
25.0
3.0
23.75

34.0
3.25
4.25
1.0
2.0
33.0
21.0
32.0
34.0
4.5
43.5
34.0

35.0Read next
All guides →
Best NSFW CYOA AI Chatbots in 2026
8 NSFW CYOA AI chatbots ranked by story depth, memory, and price — tested personally so you know which one is actually worth your money.

Best AI Sex Chat Apps in 2026
9 AI sex chat apps tested in 2026: ranked by memory, NSFW depth, pricing, and how addictive they actually are in practice.

Soulkyn Review (2026): Free Plan Tested
Soulkyn promises evolving AI roleplay companions with persistent memory and zero filters. Here's what actually happens after hours of testing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, Crushon AI allows explicit, NSFW conversations with no filters or taboo restrictions.
Absolutely. You can design custom bots with unique appearances, personalities, and backstories.
Yes, Crushon AI works seamlessly on mobile browsers and has a dedicated web app for desktop.
All conversations are encrypted and private; you control what you share and create.
Crushon AI uses advanced long-term memory, so your bot recalls details from previous sessions for more personal chats.

